The two logos that stand out to me are #4 and #6. I like the simplicity of them. #6 is very versatile and could be used many years in a row because of its timelessness.
The design that pops out to me right away is number 8, it has the most contrast and provides a dynamic approach to a double initial. In my opninion, and for fear of copyright, I must advise you that 4 may be too reminiscent of the Nintendo 64 logo, as 6 may be too reminiscent of the classic Rx which signals a pharmacy. It is for that reason I prefer 3 as a next choice after 8. It is simple yet complex, with some reformatting, 3 may prove to be the best simply due to originality.
I like #6 the most because it's very unique and versitile. I think that this logo is timeless, simple, and could fit the the golden ration. That logo fits together and could be a brand logo one day.
Out of all ten logos, my favorites are numbers 7 & 9. I am intrigued by 7's "paper airplanesque" arches that nearly connect one strand of the "M" to the other; they make this logo in particular more memorable. My main concern with that logo, however, is the color fill that you plan to use. I feel like a combination of a shadow and white will, ultimately, lure more attention to the logo, if you plan to incorporate it into images. Your best initials logo, in my opinion, is number 9. The only criticism I have about 9 is related to the lack of symmetry. I feel that if you mirrored the first strand of the "bigger M" to the second strand of "smaller M" this problem would be fixed slightly. In my opinion, If you mirrored the first strand of the "bigger M" to be the second strand of the "bigger M," one M would suffice. Number 5, to me, is the most professional and "presentable.: Stay away from 8 as its size is too distortional.
Your jagged lettering style is sick. I thought number 5 was especially nice. I like the clash between empty space and the pieces of the letters themselves. If you can coordinate the diagonal accenting as well as the vertical nature of the letter, then that example can really turn out to be something substantial.
The one that catches my eye is #9 just for the simple fact that its not the normal type of logo you'd probably see. Only thing i'd probably say about it is that it may confuse people as to what the initials are. besides that, it looks great. I'm also drawn to #6 because its simple, versatile and looks good
4, 6, and 8 were definitely the designs that stood out to me. I infacted liked the ideas of each logo but those were my favorite. 8 was really cool with the whole shadow concept. Each of those three I had listed I thought were a simple understandable logo design.
I like how number 8 has that shadow over it. Its pretty nice. I think 4 though would best fit the business logo because its block style is simple and versatile.
The two logos that stand out to me are #4 and #6. I like the simplicity of them. #6 is very versatile and could be used many years in a row because of its timelessness.
ReplyDeleteThe design that pops out to me right away is number 8, it has the most contrast and provides a dynamic approach to a double initial. In my opninion, and for fear of copyright, I must advise you that 4 may be too reminiscent of the Nintendo 64 logo, as 6 may be too reminiscent of the classic Rx which signals a pharmacy. It is for that reason I prefer 3 as a next choice after 8. It is simple yet complex, with some reformatting, 3 may prove to be the best simply due to originality.
ReplyDeleteI like #6 the most because it's very unique and versitile. I think that this logo is timeless, simple, and could fit the the golden ration. That logo fits together and could be a brand logo one day.
ReplyDeleteOut of all ten logos, my favorites are numbers 7 & 9. I am intrigued by 7's "paper airplanesque" arches that nearly connect one strand of the "M" to the other; they make this logo in particular more memorable. My main concern with that logo, however, is the color fill that you plan to use. I feel like a combination of a shadow and white will, ultimately, lure more attention to the logo, if you plan to incorporate it into images. Your best initials logo, in my opinion, is number 9. The only criticism I have about 9 is related to the lack of symmetry. I feel that if you mirrored the first strand of the "bigger M" to the second strand of "smaller M" this problem would be fixed slightly. In my opinion, If you mirrored the first strand of the "bigger M" to be the second strand of the "bigger M," one M would suffice. Number 5, to me, is the most professional and "presentable.: Stay away from 8 as its size is too distortional.
ReplyDeletei am drawn to number 9. i really like how sharp it is. it makes it unique but its hard to tell that those are m's.
ReplyDeleteYour jagged lettering style is sick. I thought number 5 was especially nice. I like the clash between empty space and the pieces of the letters themselves. If you can coordinate the diagonal accenting as well as the vertical nature of the letter, then that example can really turn out to be something substantial.
ReplyDeleteThe one that catches my eye is #9 just for the simple fact that its not the normal type of logo you'd probably see. Only thing i'd probably say about it is that it may confuse people as to what the initials are. besides that, it looks great. I'm also drawn to #6 because its simple, versatile and looks good
ReplyDelete4, 6, and 8 were definitely the designs that stood out to me. I infacted liked the ideas of each logo but those were my favorite. 8 was really cool with the whole shadow concept. Each of those three I had listed I thought were a simple understandable logo design.
ReplyDeleteI like how number 8 has that shadow over it. Its pretty nice. I think 4 though would best fit the business logo because its block style is simple and versatile.
ReplyDelete